Publications

This data paper presents an open-access database that identifies and compares 894 French general news media that broadcast their news on Facebook, Instagram, X (ex-Twitter) and/or YouTube. This database offers an up-to-date and extensive census of media active on four of the most widely used socio-numerical networks (SNNs) for news and information in France. The data paper explains and details the principles and operations of the media census: by selecting media recognized as such by various central institutions of the journalistic field, with contrasting visions of what a media is, our approach goes beyond the limits of self-definition of media and overly restrictive institutional definitions. The database includes addresses and identifiers for accessing the sites and accounts of the media studied, as well as data on their age, production volume and visibility on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. These data can be used for a wide variety of research purposes, whether they concern one or several RSNs, and the production, circulation or reception of information.

A look back at sampling methods/collection methods and the new challenges of data in SHS- The "total error" (Total Survey Error paradigm)- Its application to data collection in SHS- A look back at support for the production and analysis of innovative data within PUDs- What Big Data does to SHS- Biases linked to recruitment/collection via the Internet

Based on an ethnographic survey carried out within six social housing organizations, this article reinvestigates the issue of social housing allocations from the angle of the professional practices of those who implement them. It draws on micro-institutionalist theory, combining contributions from street-level bureaucracy and neo-institutionalism, to overcome some of the pitfalls of "bottom-up" approaches to public action, by articulating different levels of analysis and prioritizing explanations of bureaucratic work. From this perspective, the survey highlights the weight of organizational logics, and qualifies the influence of situational and dispositional factors. Indeed, while agents' social properties shape their conceptions of the job and their registers of actions, they are less decisive when it comes to explaining counter behaviour. Similarly, while interactions can modulate certain allocation decisions, there are few such adjustments, and they are contained by the institutional environment.

The unprecedented institutional and political crisis experienced by Israel even before October 7 calls for a return to its long history. For Danny Trom, its thwarted relationship with the classical model of the nation-state and sovereignty constitutes the singular matrix of this political project.

A look back at sampling methods/collection methods and the new challenges of data in SHS- The "total error" (Total Survey Error paradigm)- Its application to data collection in SHS- A look back at support for the production and analysis of innovative data within PUDs- What Big Data does to SHS- Biases linked to recruitment/collection via the Internet

This book explores the challenges that multilateralism faces today and questions the idea of a 'crisis' of multilateral cooperation and international organizations. It accounts for the pressures on and power shifts in multilateralism in recent years - such as the war in Syria, the Covid-19 pandemic, challenges for NATO, the erosion of multilateral norms, the transition from Trump to Biden, the rise of China, the post-Brexit European Union, and the mobilization of countries from the South. The authors illustrate the resilience of multilateralism and lessons learned from the WTO, UN Women, International Organizations' Secretariats and global environmental governance. Written in part by members of the Research Group on Multilateral Action (GRAM), this volume argues that 'crisis' should not be considered a pathology but the 'matrix' of multilateralism, which is more resilient than commonly thought. This book will be of interest to students and scholars of International Relations, global governance, and international organizations.

This introduction questions the idea of a "crisis" of multilateralism. It first recalls that the historical advancement of multilateralism and the steady empowerment of international organizations have always been accompanied by simultaneous destabilizing crises, from the League of Nations inability to prevent World War II up to the United Nations' long paralysis during the Cold War. Multilateralism does not seem to be in a better shape today after the assaults of President Trump against its core values and institutions, the "sanitary sovereignty" displayed by States in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the failure of the UN in the "management" of deadly armed conflicts such as the war in Syria and the war in Ukraine. However, the purpose of this book is threefold: to deconstruct the diagnosis of a "crisis" of multilateralism, to consider the concept of "crisis" as a matrix of multilateralism historical dynamic, and to demonstrate the current resilience of multilateralism.

The place of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) during Brexit negotiations was a highly debated one, as one of the explicit reasons invoked to leave the EU by British authorities was not to be submitted to EU law and CJEU's rulings. The aim of this working paper is to analyse the reasons for the specific relationship model with regard to the CJEU competences that resulted from EU-UK Brexit negotiations. While the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) excludes the jurisdiction of the CJEU in favour of a dispute settlement system more respectful of the British sovereignty, an exception is made for the situation of Northern Ireland. The paper argues that the balance between conditionality and access/participation did now allow for the application of the EEA model of voluntary submission to the CJEU: if market power Europe has explained several aspects of EU's external relations, it is of little use in the case of the UK's relation to the CJEU. Hence, the paper explores two other possible explanations. The first one, drawing on the disintegration literature, argues that voluntary submission is more likely to happen in a context of integration than of disintegration. In other words, when the relationship between the EU and the affiliated government unfolds in a context of disintegration, where both partners seek to keep their advantages, ad hoc arrangements outside the legal framework of the EU seem plausible. However, disintegration alone is not a sufficient framework to explain the precise situation in which the CJEU is replaced by an ad hoc litigation settlement. Negotiations took place in a context of uncertainty regarding what the precise consequences of the negotiated result might be. A context of uncertainty is particularly germane to power-politics, which can reinforce the asymmetries in patterns of complex inter-dependence. The second explanation then focuses on domestic politics as the main determinant: the EU may push in favour of voluntary submission, but this model can only be chosen if it serves the purpose of the third state's political power and is accepted by the governed.